[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration
From: |
Riccardo |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:08:29 +0200 |
Hey,
On Friday, October 21, 2005, at 10:50 PM, Adam Fedor wrote:
Plus we can't say, 'just update from CVS' to everyone who has a problem
anymore. Most people won't have svn, even if they knew how to do that
stuff. We need to update things like the daily snapshots.
I wonder if we could still mirror the repository on CVS? Either at gna
or savannah. Even if it is read-only.
Yes, I would find this very positive. That the "mainstream" of svn got
mirrored back in CVS. Although still, we are fine with CVS on savannah.
It's nice being there, despite all the problems.
-R
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, (continued)
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Adam Fedor, 2005/10/22
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Andrew Ruder, 2005/10/23
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Gregory John Casamento, 2005/10/23
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Andrew Ruder, 2005/10/23
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, David Ayers, 2005/10/23
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Andrew Ruder, 2005/10/23
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Markus Hitter, 2005/10/23
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Andrew Ruder, 2005/10/23
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Helge Hess, 2005/10/23
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Andrew Ruder, 2005/10/22
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration,
Riccardo <=
RE: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Adam Fedor, 2005/10/25