[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnustep-cvs] gnustep/core/base ChangeLog Headers/Additions/G...
From: |
Adam Fedor |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnustep-cvs] gnustep/core/base ChangeLog Headers/Additions/G... |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:46:56 -0700 |
On Feb 23, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Alex Perez wrote:
Two for Two. This is a touchy subject, but it just keeps happening
over and over and over again. Richard, would it be possible for you to
actually /test/ the code you commit to CVS? (not the code you write on
your machine, the actual code which actually gets comitted to CVS, the
code other people must use)? The entire GNUstep community will benefit
from higher QC, Lets learn from our mistakes, instead of repeating
them bi-weekly.
Why are you getting so upset over two missing headers? It's quite a
simple mistake, particularly for a patch that would probably have never
gotten in if Richard hadn't spent some time on an OS he never uses.
Please be more patient.
- Re: [Gnustep-cvs] gnustep/core/base ChangeLog Headers/Additions/G..., Fred Kiefer, 2005/02/23
- Re: [Gnustep-cvs] gnustep/core/base ChangeLog Headers/Additions/G..., Alex Perez, 2005/02/23
- Re: [Gnustep-cvs] gnustep/core/base ChangeLog Headers/Additions/G...,
Adam Fedor <=
- Re: [Gnustep-cvs] gnustep/core/base ChangeLog Headers/Additions/G..., Fred Kiefer, 2005/02/23
- [RFC] Automated QA build system, Alex Perez, 2005/02/24
- Re: [RFC] Automated QA build system, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/02/24
- Re: [RFC] Automated QA build system, Adam Fedor, 2005/02/24
- Re: [RFC] Automated QA build system, Fred Kiefer, 2005/02/24
- Re: [RFC] Automated QA build system, Nicola Pero, 2005/02/24
- Re: [RFC] Automated QA build system, Nicola Pero, 2005/02/24
Re: [Gnustep-cvs] gnustep/core/base ChangeLog Headers/Additions/G..., Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/02/24