[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[taler-docs] branch master updated: DD18 question
From: |
gnunet |
Subject: |
[taler-docs] branch master updated: DD18 question |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:36:28 +0200 |
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
dold pushed a commit to branch master
in repository docs.
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 1226c0d DD18 question
1226c0d is described below
commit 1226c0dde2a8379f1ec0fad6099357dc3dcb60e5
Author: Florian Dold <florian@dold.me>
AuthorDate: Mon Apr 12 19:36:24 2021 +0200
DD18 question
---
design-documents/018-contract-json.rst | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/design-documents/018-contract-json.rst
b/design-documents/018-contract-json.rst
index 2bc147b..7c62600 100644
--- a/design-documents/018-contract-json.rst
+++ b/design-documents/018-contract-json.rst
@@ -126,6 +126,9 @@ The hash of a member value ``memb_val`` with salt
``memb_salt`` is computed as f
salt: memb_salt,
});
+When encoding ``memb_salted_hash`` with base32-crockford, the resulting output
+must be upper-case.
+
Scrubbing
---------
@@ -165,3 +168,6 @@ Discussion / Q&A
forgetting a member. This would save storage. But to prove that a certain
forgettable info matches the contract terms, the prover would need to
also store/provide the salt.
+
+* What validations should the wallet do? Should the wallet ever accept
+ contract terms where fields are already forgotten?
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
gnunet@gnunet.org.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [taler-docs] branch master updated: DD18 question,
gnunet <=