[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] question about src/transport
From: |
N |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] question about src/transport |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:28:31 +0000 |
N transcribed 2.8K bytes:
> Christian Grothoff transcribed 48K bytes:
> > The only reason I can think of is that the file was somehow _not_
> > provided on some systems. If that has changed and these days it is
> > properly exported by the kernel, we should use the system file.
>
> Okay, I will look into it.
> Thanks!
If Debian is a benchmark for a lack of things in obvious places,
it wins.
This will take a bit longer, and there might be a hybrid solution
at the end.
> > On 9/16/19 9:24 AM, N wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > can someone explain to me why we seem to bundle a linux specific
> > > version of net80211/ieee80211_radiotap.h?
> > > The diff to what I have in NetBSD at first reading and comparison
> > > is minimal (biggest difference: our file is BSD-3, my file is BSD-2).
> > >
> > > Either I skipped over it too many times, or there is no explanation
> > > on doing this instead of using system provided files.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > GNUnet-developers mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
> > >
>
> pub RSA 4096/E29FC3CC 2014-12-09 Christian Grothoff <address@hidden>
> > sub RSA 4096/117E1AFB 2014-12-09
> >
>
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > GNUnet-developers mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature