[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues
From: |
IC Rainbow |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Apr 2019 08:33:44 +0300 |
Maybe it would be useful for quickstarting F2F networks then?
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:06 AM Christian Grothoff <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Well, but that's the point: it shouldn't make sense for normal users.
> This is only for shipping hard-coded HELLOs with a distribution where an
> expiration time makes no sense as those HELLOs "should" be for stable
> peers used to bootstrap. All the 'normal' HELLOs peers learn should be
> soft-state and expire eventually (if the peer is not reachable anymore).
>
> On 4/29/19 11:35 PM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Should we maybe install this tool if it makes sense for normal users?
> > On small systems (OpenWrt, ...) GNUnet is anyway split into a few
> > dozens of packages, one more wouldn't hurt ;)
>
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues, (continued)
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues, ng0, 2019/04/25
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues, Christian Grothoff, 2019/04/26
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues, IC Rainbow, 2019/04/26
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues, Christian Grothoff, 2019/04/27
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues, IC Rainbow, 2019/04/29
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues, Christian Grothoff, 2019/04/29
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues, IC Rainbow, 2019/04/29
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues, Christian Grothoff, 2019/04/29
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues, Daniel Golle, 2019/04/29
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues, Christian Grothoff, 2019/04/29
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues,
IC Rainbow <=
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues, Christian Grothoff, 2019/04/30
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues, ng0, 2019/04/30
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Network size issues, ng0, 2019/04/30