Re: [GNUnet-developers] p≡p

[Christian Grothoff]

On 4/20/19 4:03 PM, t3sserakt wrote:
>>> I am especially interested in the work regarding TNG. I also would like
>>> to hear more about TNG before the GNUnet Hacker Meeting. In the past
>>> there was a more or less regular GNUnet dev mumble meeting. Maybe we
>>> could have one where we get an introduction into TNG. As preparation for
>>> such a mumble meeting I would start to look into the actual transport code.
>> That's a good idea, a good day for me for such a Mumble would be May 1st.
> 
> On bank holiday I am usually spending time with my family. If it is at
> the beginning or end of the day I can make it, but not during the day.

We can certainly do it late, say 9pm?

>> Best preparation would probably reading up on NAT traversal and
>> fingerprinting attacks on TLS. The IETF QUIC draft also seems like it
>> has quite a few interesting ideas in it, I haven't fully digested it
>> myself, but for someone looking to contribute on topics like traffic
>> amplification and congestion control, that draft likely has some ideas
>> we'll want to eventually take into consideration.
> 
> All documents in here
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/quic/documents/
> 
> or specific ones?

Specific ones:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-transport/ and maybe
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-recovery/

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature