[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] about gnunet-gns-proxy-setup-ca
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] about gnunet-gns-proxy-setup-ca |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Mar 2019 01:20:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 |
You are right, the existing option should probably be changed to -f. And
if someone hacks options on that script, adding -c for the configuration
file and -h for help and -v for version would also be good ideas...
On 3/7/19 12:34 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> Fixing up a man page for gnunet-gns-proxy-ca to get rid of the
> symlink I looked at the code again.
>
> It seems as if the self-documenting output is a bit misleading
> for people using it, or should be expanded.
>
> gnunet-gns-proxy-setup-ca works without passing an option argument.
> If we do, "c" is the "-f"/"--filename" of gnunet-config. To keep
> a common vocabulary between the pages and the options, shouldn't
> it be -f for gnunet-gns-proxy-setup-ca, or am I misunderstanding
> the script?
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
>