Re: [GNUnet-developers] estimated 0.11 release or next rc?

[Hartmut Goebel]

Am 28.01.19 um 13:40 schrieb Schanzenbach, Martin:
> My angle would be that managing gitlab instead of BB+mantis+gitolite is:
> 1. Less maintenance overhead (A single solution)
> 2. Better integration (see above)
> 3. Better overall quality and appearance (subjectively)

I strongly support moving to an integrated system like gitlab. While
Martin already mentioned many reasons, I want to add one:

* Attracting more developers

The current setup requires three(?) accounts, learning new systems
(mantis, BB), adopting to a new workflow. learning where to find what,
etc. Additionally Matis is just old-fashined and uncomfortable to use.
This will distract new developers. And those who are conviced will spend
time in learning this setup instead of contributing to the project.

Oh, cool NOT: When clicking on "Development Corner -> Bucktracking" I
get "blocked by CSP" from the embedded frame :-)

-- 
Schönen Gruß
Hartmut Goebel
Dipl.-Informatiker (univ), CISSP, CSSLP, ISO 27001 Lead Implementer
Information Security Management, Security Governance, Secure Software
Development

Goebel Consult, Landshut
http://www.goebel-consult.de

Blog:
https://www.goe-con.de/blog/das-fass-ist-voll-grunde-linux-201asystemd2018-zu-meiden

Kolumne:
https://www.goe-con.de/hartmut-goebel/cissp-gefluester/2010-08-scheingefechte-um-rim

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature