[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] nat
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] nat |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jan 2019 17:03:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 |
Have you tried calling upnpc by hand? Does it work then with the port
forwarding? if it does, check how GNUnet calls upnpc, maybe the
command-line syntax has changed / differs on your system!?
On 1/20/19 3:51 PM, Catonano wrote:
>
>
> Il giorno dom 20 gen 2019 alle ore 15:14 Catonano <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> ha scritto:
>
> Hello
>
> In the file ~/.config/gnunet.conf I wrote this
>
> [nat]
> ENABLE_UPNP = YES
>
> The upnp command is available and upnp is enabled in the router
>
> but still these 2 lines appear in the output
>
> Jan 20 15:06:20-664904 nat-6787 WARNING upnpc failed to create port
> mapping
> Jan 20 15:06:20-679750 nat-6787 WARNING upnpc failed to create port
> mapping
>
> is anyone using upnp or are you all configuring the router by hand ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> I'm asking this because in the router I can't find an option to give a
> static IP to my laptop, I must get an IP through the DHCP service
>
> So I'd have to reconfigure the NAT punching (or port forwarding) every
> time I get a different IP
>
> I'd prefer having the upnp thing going
>
> Thanks again
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [GNUnet-developers] nat, Catonano, 2019/01/20
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] nat, Catonano, 2019/01/20
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] nat,
Christian Grothoff <=
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] nat, Catonano, 2019/01/20
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] nat, Christian Grothoff, 2019/01/20
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] nat, Catonano, 2019/01/21
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] nat, Christian Grothoff, 2019/01/21
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] nat, Catonano, 2019/01/21
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] nat, Christian Grothoff, 2019/01/21
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] nat, Catonano, 2019/01/21
Re: [GNUnet-developers] nat, Kai A. Hiller, 2019/01/21