Re: [GNUnet-developers] website and logo rework

[Schanzenbach, Martin]

Thanks.

Wait. So look at the gnunetbib.bib file line 526.
This cannot possibly go through the parser, right?
I just fixed a _lot_ of those locally but I am not sure if that was correct?
Also, most of the "abstract" values are in double quotes {{}}. Is there a 
reason for that?
Now that I have fixed all of them it does still throw the same exception and a 
billion ERRORS before that.

What exactly do you mean by "track down the right link. enter data of gnunet".
Do we need to manually add all the www_* tags? Can't we just have them optional?

> On 17. May 2018, at 18:57, Nils Gillmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Schanzenbach, Martin transcribed 10K bytes:
>> Hey,
>> 
>>> On 17. May 2018, at 17:12, Nils Gillmann <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Christian Grothoff transcribed 34K bytes:
>>>> Dear all,
> …
>>>> On 05/17/2018 04:07 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
>>>>>> A very good reference for all of this is this website: 
>>>>>> https://www.zeronet.io/en
>>>>>> The only problem with that is that it's kind of like a visiting card.
>>>>>> Another reference, which is good, is this website: 
>>>>>> https://freifunk.net/en/
>>>>>> Additionally, what the second website makes better than the first 
>>>>>> reference, is that it's not just a visiting card. It strongly interacts 
>>>>>> with the audience. It gives impulse to click on videos, zoom into maps 
>>>>>> dynamically displaying what's going on in the free wireless network that 
>>>>>> this project Freifunk is all about.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Agreed. I am not sure, but isn't there a redesign in the works? Who does 
>>>>> it? And is there progress or is it done behind closed doors? (Just asking)
>>>> 
>>>> Not at all, the Git repository for the main page (under development) is
>>>> at  https://gnunet.org/git/www.git/
>>>> 
>>>> Now, the plan is that some parts will be generated, like the texinfo
>>>> handbook in gnunet.git will be HTMLized and put online in the usual way,
>>> 
>>> - where we agreed (I think?) for deploying them on docs.gnunet.org with some
>>> structure.
>>> I'd like to have documentation of more than just gnunet on there 
>>> (gnunet-gtk,
>>> gnunet-python, etc etc).
>>> 
>>>> and the IRC bots (will/are being?) rewritten to avoid the Drupal-ness.
>>> 
>>> - the plan here was to use what powers botbot.me, at least Devan porposed
>>>  this.
>>> 
>>>> Similarly, the goal is to convert the existing bibiography data to
>>>> anonbib-style.  I don't know where the repos for those are (ng0 ought
>>>> to), but they should be opened to all as soon as there is something there.
>>> 
>>> - https://gnunet.org/git/gnunetbib.git/, which is progressing with extreme
>>> slowness (as is my work on anonbib itself), contributors *really* welcome
>>> and more than just wanted! basically you try to build the bib and see it 
>>> crash,
>>> track down the right link. enter data of gnunet, or something like that.
>>> It's been too long since I've looked at it. It's mostly selfexplanatory, but
>>> if you are in doubt, ask on this list.
>> 
>> Sorry for highjacking this thread but: When I tried a make I got a lot of 
>> errors regarding double quotes "}}" that were basically wrong. Did that 
>> happen in some kind of auto conversion?
>> After fixing around 30 of those I get this error:
>> 
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>  File "writeHTML.py", line 249, in <module>
>>    writePageSet(config, bib, tag)
>>  File "writeHTML.py", line 157, in writePageSet
>>    cache_url_path=cache_url_path)
>>  File "writeHTML.py", line 109, in writeHTML
>>    base_url=root)
>>  File "writeHTML.py", line 49, in writeBody
>>    print >>f, e.to_html(cache_path=cache_path, base_url=base_url)
>>  File "/Users/schanzen/gnunet/gnunetbib/BibTeX.py", line 603, in to_html
>>    htmlAuthors = [ a.htmlizeWithLink() for a in self.parsedAuthor ]
>> TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable
>> make: *** [all] Error 1
>> 
>> BR
> 
> No, there was no auto conversion.
> 
> Okay, I just looked into this again. So basically I think I
> took my work on anonbib upstream (tor), and based the repo
> you find on gnunet.org on it. It's a little ahead in terms
> of number of links being 404s fixed.
> I also wrote a README for gnunet.
> 
> Hm.. the gnunet.bib was indeed the result of exporting from Drupal and then
> adjusting to what the anonbib considers valid. Tags we have are not included
> but should be applied later on.

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP