[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] / [Ring] Question
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] / [Ring] Question |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 20:40:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 |
Well, I'd not want to expose that kind of level of detail, but simply
communicate "on battery" vs. "on the grid". But yes, adding such a flag
to the respective GNUnet message is (part of) the plan.
On 09/14/2017 08:34 PM, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> That issue with battery consumption is indeed problematic.
>
> I'm not an expert on network stuff, but I wonder if there is a way to
> make a distinguished "packet" that tells GNUnet (or GNU Ring) the peer's
> power level, power supply health (if applicable), and based on this,
> transfer the "hard work" to more capable peers (this is based on [1]).
>
> [1] <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6972>.
>
> Christian Grothoff <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Well, I may be able to partially answer that question: Speaking for the
>> GNUnet side, I personally simply don't think GNUnet is quite ready for
>> GNU Ring at this time.
>>
>> Specifically, we need to make GNUnet easier to install and particular
>> self-configuring in terms of the network stack (NAT traversal, etc.).
>> For GNU Ring in particular, I've heard people being concerned about
>> battery consumption, so we also need to work on the GNUnet-on-mobile
>> scenario where peers can indicate that they are on a mobile phone and
>> should not be routing traffic for others, least we drain people's
>> batteries (and get terrible network performance on top of it).
>>
>> Once those things are fixed, I would hope the GNU Ring hackers will have
>> time for a chat, and we'll find out if we could benefit from an
>> integration. Until then, I would encourage them to prioritize other
>> issues, even though I would of course like them to use GNUnet
>> eventually. Now, if someone wants to see that happen, I'd very much
>> look forward for people helping out with the issues mentioned in the
>> previous paragraph -- but note that none of them are doable quickly.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GNUnet-developers mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
>>
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [GNUnet-developers] Survey for organizing GNUnet in-person meetings, t3sserakt, 2017/09/07
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Survey for organizing GNUnet in-person meetings, dvn, 2017/09/07
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Survey for organizing GNUnet in-person meetings, lurchi, 2017/09/07
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Survey for organizing GNUnet in-person meetings, Martin Schanzenbach, 2017/09/09
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Survey for organizing GNUnet in-person meetings, ng0, 2017/09/09
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Survey for organizing GNUnet in-person meetings, Adonay Felipe Nogueira, 2017/09/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Survey for organizing GNUnet in-person meetings, xrs, 2017/09/20
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Survey for organizing GNUnet in-person meetings, Matthias Wachs, 2017/09/26
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Survey for organizing GNUnet in-person meetings, carlo von lynX, 2017/09/26