[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Listing Egos
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Listing Egos |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jan 2016 12:39:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0 |
I suspect it is the usual: the APIs are developed when they're first
needed, and then evolve a bit based on the needs of the applications
using them. It's not like there is a unified "only one way to write any
API"-plan at work here.
On 01/26/2016 11:57 PM, Martin Schanzenbach wrote:
> I was just wondering if there is a reasoning behind the way identity is
> implemented vs namestore (API wise).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [GNUnet-developers] Listing Egos, zPlus, 2016/01/22
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Listing Egos, Christian Grothoff, 2016/01/22
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Listing Egos, zPlus, 2016/01/22
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Listing Egos, Christian Grothoff, 2016/01/22
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Listing Egos, zPlus, 2016/01/22
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Listing Egos, Christian Grothoff, 2016/01/22
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Listing Egos, Martin Schanzenbach, 2016/01/22
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Listing Egos, Christian Grothoff, 2016/01/23
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Listing Egos, Martin Schanzenbach, 2016/01/26
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Listing Egos,
Christian Grothoff <=