Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUnet releases

[David Barksdale]

Do you think we should call it 0.11? We pretty thoroughly broke 
compatibility with 0.10.

On 01/26/2016 07:36 AM, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> It's not the difficulty of the release process, it's that CADET still is
> known to sometimes crash, which for me is not acceptable for a
> release...  So if you want to see a release, there are 4 bugs that are
> marked as RC for 0.10.2:
>
> https://gnunet.org/bugs/roadmap_page.php
>
> https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=3994
> https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=4020
> https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=4040
> https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=4001
>
> Once those are fixed, I'll be happy to do the rest.
>
> On 01/26/2016 02:28 PM, zPlus wrote:
> > The person maintaining GNUnet packages for Debian, takes
> > https://gnunet.org/downloads as a reference for new releases (he doesn't
> > fetch from SVN HEAD). This is problematic because there are very few
> > updates at that link, in fact the source code currently available for
> > download is almost 2 years old.
> >
> > I was wondering whether it would be possible to schedule more releases,
> > more often. Perhaps it's possible to setup a script to run every once in
> > a while?
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GNUnet-developers mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GNUnet-developers mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers