[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] [Gsoc 2015] Project proposal on GNUnet-over-ICMP
From: |
DocMalloc |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] [Gsoc 2015] Project proposal on GNUnet-over-ICMP |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Mar 2015 20:59:13 +0100 |
Heyhey ...
I have already replied to Wen to discuss the topic. IMHO it is a
suitable topic for a 3 month project in particular since the design
process requires some preliminary work to fix a the protocol used not
focusing on just hacking.
This is in particular true when a student is doing such a project who
has to familiarize with the existing code and the existing
functionality. Therefore I think this is a very suitable project.
I would prefer to have a well-designed and documented approach instead
of having a complex project requiring a student to just "hack" on a
gazillion line of code for 3 month ...
-M
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 20:09 +0100, Bart Polot wrote:
> Hi Wen,
>
>
> In my opinion a ICMP transport would share most of the code with UDP
> and therefore it would be a minor feature, not a 3 month, full-time
> project like GSoC requires. We welcome students to participate, feel
> free to browse our bugtracker to find other feature requests that
> might be more to the scale of GSoC (the core traffic levels might be
> one, maybe something related to multicast).
>
>
> Happy hacking!
>
>
> Bart Polot
>
> On 19 March 2015 at 18:20, Yuzhong Wen <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> My name is Yuzhong Wen and I’d like to participate with a
> project for GNUNet at Gsoc.
>
>
> So from the idea page I saw that GNUNet is going to implement
> multiple transport services support, so my idea is to build a
> transport service which is based on ICMP. Specifically, I want
> to build something like a Ping-tunnel between 2 peers. This
> could be useful in the situation that the firewall has blocked
> transport layer protocols (like a firewall blocks most of the
> UDP and TCP connections using a white list policy) and only
> allows ICMP packets to passthrough the gateway.
>
>
> I just submitted the proposal, however I’m not sure if this
> idea is viable in current GNUNet design since right now I’m
> still trying to understand the architecutre of GNUNet. Is
> there a mentor that can give me some advises on that? Thanks!
>
>
> Here’s the link to my proposal, should be accessable by
> organization members.
>
>
> https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/student/google/gsoc2015/ywen/5629499534213120
>
>
> ———
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wen
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part