[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Camouflage
From: |
LRN |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Camouflage |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Dec 2012 00:51:10 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20.0 Thunderbird/20.0a1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 30.11.2012 13:07, Matthias Wachs wrote:
>>
>> 1) Fake HELLO messages.
>
> [...]
>
> So in the end: I do not see any benefit here...
>
Yeah, that was a stupid idea anyway.
>>
>> 2) Transport disguise.
>
> That's an arms race you cannot win ... we are operating in the
> open, anyone can download our software and even read our
> discussions on the other hand we do not event have a clue who the
> malicious guys are and how powerful they are.
>
>
> In the end:
>
> - I agree to add a "Do not gossip" flag to HELLOs but only for
> efficency reasons.
>
> - I agree to improve https server validation behaviour to prevent
> MITM attacks.
>
> I'll file bugs for it...
\o/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQuRw+AAoJEOs4Jb6SI2CwVEwH+wXiKQrFNvvJ8dQQzgRauGxb
3j8gtB3QwqNHNTsMkTHC/e5BA8X5dP+O+Uz7IC9y0RF7noUIVzcqiwJKTQ13GnEK
MIRGLKirJG+wc2uwtH9keNI0jqu2zquRylRofFuipd8gbqz8IkEOomwh8bdfygyW
dZFt2oUc7Uq/oHXDBLOxns7y1JoYWK4vll3tGiwksaNzXFui2gOzcFcA5Gs5/qsY
/4JqTqjknudVHibhWtOxY31LT1KMSpPMNLDfsrt1k4sjtYA7JAlDEEu7XUyeqP3x
pAJ4EoQTKDHASn9zoNoqqYQ16SFDyXFo8ikEsvpK9ZFxhHPzFTVC58/mSQy5RH8=
=Lsnk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [GNUnet-developers] Camouflage, LRN, 2012/11/24
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Camouflage, Bart Polot, 2012/11/29
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Camouflage, Christian Grothoff, 2012/11/29
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Camouflage, LRN, 2012/11/29
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Camouflage, Christian Grothoff, 2012/11/29
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Camouflage, LRN, 2012/11/29
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Camouflage, Christian Grothoff, 2012/11/30
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Camouflage, Matthias Wachs, 2012/11/30
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Camouflage,
LRN <=