[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] gnunet-check segfault
From: |
Glenn McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] gnunet-check segfault |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Mar 2004 00:23:27 +1100 |
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:28:04 +0200 (EET)
Igor Wronsky <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Glenn McGrath wrote:
>
> > Anyone else seeing segfaults on gnunet-check ?
>
> Umm. No. How about a gdb backtrace output, if you can
> reproduce? The strace doesn't tell much.
(gdb) bt
#0 0x400eb535 in vfprintf () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
Not much help...
Adding a breakpoint and stepping through until the segfault gives this
last backtrace, the line numbers will be a bit out due to some debugging
i added.
(gdb) bt
#0 checkIndexedFile (name=0x838f6d8 "<my secret indexed content>",
index=2, sock=0x838f488) at gnunet-check.c:768
#1 0x0804a591 in forEachIndexedFile (method=0x804e5b0
#<checkIndexedFile>,
data=0x838f488) at fileindex.c:263
#2 0x0804e733 in checkIndexedFileList () at gnunet-check.c:812
#3 0x0804f111 in main (argc=41, argv=0x29) at gnunet-check.c:1131
At one point i see
PRINTQ (format=0x30 <Address 0x30 out of bounds>) at gnunet-check.c:61
Which corresponds to
static void PRINTQ(char * format,
...) {
va_list args;
if (be_quiet == YES)
return;
va_start(args, format);
vfprintf(stdout, format, args);
va_end(args);
}
But its getting past this, i need to test it with dmalloc, which i need
to reinstall, will have a go tommorow.
Glenn
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] gnunet-check segfault,
Glenn McGrath <=