[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Potentially Unsafe Default Application Protocols
|
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
|
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Potentially Unsafe Default Application Protocols? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 18:08:24 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 02 February 2004 05:44 pm, Alexander Winston wrote:
> In <file:///etc/gnunet.conf>, the comments warn that "All protocols but
> 'afs_protocol' are potential security risks." Why, then, are all of them
> included by default?
Because we want people to test them -- and they can be useful for developers
for testing the performance of the network (i.e., it is possible to get an
idea what the topology of the network looks like, or how much traffic is
theoretically possible between certain peers).
Christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAHthp9tNtMeXQLkIRAgoQAKCLVRRiyrMqrQjsnyxNUrSeXmsg/wCbB6Ur
AnFi0o7/IbBwawmIJ+LZ4fc=
=2eKX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----