[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Databases benchmark and problem
From: |
Kevin Atkinson |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Databases benchmark and problem |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Apr 2003 08:36:49 -0400 (EDT) |
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, eric haumant wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just made some tests with the five database types of GNUnet. This
> results have been made with a 100Mo file (with random content) that have
> been inserted in the database. Here is the results :
>
> - MySQL :
> Upload Speed : 400 ko/s
> Download Speed : 300 ko/s
> Space used : 113 Mo.
>
>
> - GDBM :
> Upload Speed : 500 ko/s
> Download Speed : 400 ko/s
> Space used : 148 Mo.
>
> - TDB :
> Upload Speed : 27 ko/s
> Download Speed : 12 ko/s
> Space used : 118 Mo.
>
> - BDB :
> Upload Speed : 340 ko/s
> Download Speed : 260 ko/s
> Space used : 435 Mo (DISKQUOTA=300 !!).
BDB has a lot of tunable parameters. You might get better performance and
space usage by reading over the performance parts of
http://www.sleepycat.com/docs/reftoc.html and perhaps adjusting some of
them. I don't see any reason why BDB should be far worse than GDBM once
tuned properly.
--
http://kevin.atkinson.dhs.org
- [GNUnet-developers] Databases benchmark and problem, eric haumant, 2003/04/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Databases benchmark and problem, Glenn McGrath, 2003/04/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Databases benchmark and problem, Christian Grothoff, 2003/04/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Databases benchmark and problem, Christian Grothoff, 2003/04/15
- RE: [GNUnet-developers] Databases benchmark and problem, Jan Marco Alkema, 2003/04/16
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Databases benchmark and problem,
Kevin Atkinson <=
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Databases benchmark and problem, Igor Wronsky, 2003/04/16