[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[GNUnet-developers] Re: GNUnet suggestion...
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
[GNUnet-developers] Re: GNUnet suggestion... |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:18:01 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 11 October 2002 03:03 pm, you wrote:
> I noticed today that I keep getting hung up on that TCP timeout bug you
> found yesterday. Of course that needs to be fixed, but I noticed something
> else as well...
>
> One IP that repeatedly make me have to wait for the TCP timeout is the DHCP
> address that my laptop was assigned yesterday at school. Shouldn't a day
> be long enough for all the nodes in the system to learn about and remove a
> dead node from the list of GNUnet nodes? Does GNUnet have a mechinism for
> completely removing a dead node from the system? If so, how long will it
> take? how long will it take on a larger scale, say 1000 nodes? On a large
> scale where nodes are coming and going often not removing dead nodes might
> add quite a bit to the over head.
The time that your advertised IP is going to be considered valid is specified
in your gnunet.conf (timeout option). So if you advertise 1 week, 1 week it
is. There is currently no cap on the time that can be advertised, but you are
right, we probably want to introduce some cap at some point -- but what would
be a reasonable is up for debate.
Christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9p0AJ9tNtMeXQLkIRAvveAJ9M1i2H4TmFTxq6P0kz1ktqWGYWFACfXRyM
XlnQ1vuTp0GHcCd2Tqx4lKM=
=7iVG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [GNUnet-developers] Re: GNUnet suggestion...,
Christian Grothoff <=