[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] pending 1.3 release was: Re: [Gnumed-bugs] <bug>: and
From: |
Busser, Jim |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] pending 1.3 release was: Re: [Gnumed-bugs] <bug>: and again.... without signing any document, |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Feb 2013 15:18:22 +0000 |
On 2013-02-01, at 6:16 AM, Karsten Hilbert <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 01:26:03PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
>
>>> user comment : and again.... without signing any document, just after
>>> clicking on items and switching back to inbox
>>
>> Is there any news on this problem ?
>
> I now being to consider releasing 1.3 before we definitively
> pin down this problem which seems quite elusive and hard to
> track. Of course, 1.3 would contain all the code developed
> so far intended to help track and/or mitigate the problem.
>
> Eventually 1.4 will contain one major change (switch to PG
> 9.0) which by itself helps close the margin for this (sort
> of) problem to occur, I reckon.
>
> Thoughts ?
While I agree that a bug squash would be nice, I am interested to obtain
benefits from 1.3 which -- by the way making generally available the code which
can also help to identify the bug -- will maybe assist reports that help in the
bug fixing?
-- Jim