[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Aug 2010 04:43:11 +0200 |
> i have catered for this in business/GMHL7.py by creating one patient
> "encounter" per OBR,
What if there is more than one OBR per patient ? (Is that possible ?)
Does it create several encounters during one import ? That I would
not agree with.
> the only thing is: at any time where messages (updates) are received which
> do NOT match up with prior ones (missing OBRs), the hierarchy WILL be
> destroyed. so, jim, karsten, sebastien, anyone: have you actually seen
> any
> HL7 data where HL7 updates do NOT contain the exact same OBR-OBX
> hierarchy?
> it's important to know.
Saying "yes" will not prove anything. Only if some spec says "this is
illegal" should we reject this...
Karsten
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, lkcl, 2010/08/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings,
Karsten Hilbert <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, lkcl, 2010/08/10
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, Karsten Hilbert, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, lkcl, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, Karsten Hilbert, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, lkcl, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, Karsten Hilbert, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, Elizabeth Dodd, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More lab test result considerations: groupings, lkcl, 2010/08/25