[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming languag
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management) |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:28:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:17:05PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > 3. in the tarball /docs/ I found a second copy of gnumed-
> > client.conf.example (same as client/etc/gnumed) making me concerned
> > the source may keep redundant obsolete copies.
>
> I am currently not aware of any but I'd be happy
> to remove duplicates.
There was indeed a duplicate which is now fixed.
> > 4. there exist also in the tarball files that seem optional:
> >
> > egk+kvk-demon.conf.example
> > gnumed-client-init_script.sh
> >
> > ... shall we relocate within the tarball, outside client
> > ... either into external-tools or (if that is not suitable)
Done. At least for the script.
> Not the .example (because that's docs/) but probably the init
> script. They aren't used yet, however, anyway.
>
> > ... also inside egk+kvk-demon.conf.example
> > can
> > # Copy this file to /etc/gnumed/ekg+kvk-demon.conf ...
> > be changed to
> > # Copy this file to /etc/gnumed-client
It already says so ?
Also, you don't need it unless you plan on reading German
medical insurance cards.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/13
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management),
Karsten Hilbert <=
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Choice of programming language and project management, Gour, 2009/09/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Choice of programming language and project management, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/07
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Choice of programming language and project management, Gour, 2009/09/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Choice of programming language and project management, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/07
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Choice of programming language and project management, Andreas Tille, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] goodbye (was Re: Choice of programming language and project management), Gour, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] goodbye (was Re: Choice of programming language and project management), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] goodbye (was Re: Choice of programming language and project management), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08