[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnumed-devel] Packaging (Was: Naming convention)
From: |
Jim Busser |
Subject: |
[Gnumed-devel] Packaging (Was: Naming convention) |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:34:19 -0700 |
On 7-Sep-09, at 2:17 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
The ~/.gnumed/ is IMO created
by the first run of gnumed.py as well as the gnumed.conf therein.
Thanks, it is hard to reverse engineer such things when one already
did multiple steps (install and run) while not yet knowing so well the
insides of the code... :-)
The above is good news, because if it is the gnumed.py which takes
care of the instantiation of the user's files it means less for the OS
(distro) - specific package to have to do,
Is the same true of ~/gnumed which contains
export
logs
xdt
??
Also, Debian apparently copies from tarball the shell script
client/gnumed --> /usr/bin/gnumed
and several directories of client code and resources, which appear
under Debian to get copied into
/usr/share/gnumed
and these get referenced by virtue of decommenting
# export PYTHONPATH
and adding an "export PATH" line as follows in /usr/bin/gnumed
# packages which install the GNUmed python modules into a path not
# already accessible for imports via sys.path (say, /usr/share/gnumed/)
# may need to adjust PYTHONPATH appropriately here
export PYTHONPATH="${PYTHONPATH}:/usr/share/gnumed/"
export PATH="${PATH}:/usr/share/gnumed/bin"
... but there is no "bin" in my /usr/share/gnumed/bin in which case is
the above needed for some other purpose?
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Jim Busser, 2009/09/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Jim Busser, 2009/09/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Jim Busser, 2009/09/07
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Packaging (Was: Naming convention),
Jim Busser <=
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/09
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09