[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Results tracking (actioning)
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Results tracking (actioning) |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Mar 2005 14:23:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
> If a doctor had not set focus on that patient, but had instead
> accessed the results off multiple patients through a lab journal
> viewer, it could be tidy for an automated entry to be written into
> the record of each affected patient.
Why not just set the review fields ?
> Also, because a clinician who is reviewing results may not set as
> True all of the available results for a particular patient, maybe
> test_results requires a date_time() stamp for
> reviewed_by_clinician_when or reviewed_when
a) what for ?
b) it already has a date/time stamp in the audit fields
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] close-patient, (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] close-patient, J Busser, 2005/03/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] close-patient, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/03/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] close-patient, J Busser, 2005/03/12
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] close-patient, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/03/12
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] close-patient, J Busser, 2005/03/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] close-patient, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/03/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More scratch pad comments, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/03/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More scratch pad comments, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/03/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] More scratch pad comments, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/03/08
[Gnumed-devel] Results tracking (actioning), J Busser, 2005/03/05
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Results tracking (actioning),
Karsten Hilbert <=
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Results tracking (was: gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1), Karsten Hilbert, 2005/03/05
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Results tracking (was: gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1), Karsten Hilbert, 2005/03/05