[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Jims SOAP comments + Dr Messages+ Time Elapsed
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Jims SOAP comments + Dr Messages+ Time Elapsed |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:05:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
> re: Patient Requests, History Taken, Clinical Findings, Assessment, Plan
> So it could be "Purpose" (since "Objective" would need disambiguation
> from the Objective examination).
I am fine with any of these.
> To all, within Purpose (or Patient requests or RFE), does it matter
> whether one part "followup high BP" was doctor-initiated while some
> other part was patient initiated?
It might matter medico-legally someday but I don't think we
need to let that influence our labelling decision. One would
either document that fact in the Purpose itself ("seeks
followup high BP") or prove that from a string of other clues,
eg a phone call encounter about a followup recall, an
appointment booking, ...
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346