[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Carlos - Soap2 - design comments
From: |
Ian Haywood |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Carlos - Soap2 - design comments |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:30:15 +1100 |
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:19:30 +1100
Richard Terry <address@hidden> wrote:
> tree like list of encounters very often. Having this take up valuable
> workspace next to your input area's is a waste of screen real-estate
> deprives you of much peripheral information.
Then how should the past history be presented?
(Your original client didn't have a past-history screen, as I recall) IMHO we
need a rich way of organising the medical history
and a tree widget is the most logical, but I'm happy to consider other options.
One thing is for certain, you are never going to get a bunch of docs
in different countries with different workflows, regulations etc. to agree 100%
on a GUI (hell, you and Horst work in the *same* discipline in the *same*
country, and your approaches are poles apart)
This is why we have implemented pluggable window managers (like window
managers for X) so we (as developers) can mix'n'match the high-level GUI
components such as the SOAP control, to our heart's content. Users don't have
to get involved in this, they can select from a list of pre-made layouts,
your's among them.
> would like to contribute time/money to our effort, if only we could > show
> some progress and unity.
This the problem, by the time gnuMed has enough functionality to be taken
seriously, we are "over the hump" and don't need the help so much.
These people, if they are listening: *NOW* is the time to stump up
support if you want a FOSS medical recorda app in Australia, not when the hard
yards are over!
> us in australia because of local legislation regarding requirements
> for medical records. If the project actually produced something, it
> could become part of that process, rather than being trashed by it.
AFAICT Germany already has this law (that medical software be accredited), that
doesn't seem to stop the brothers Hilbert.
[Karsten/Sebastian, can you clarify this situation?]
Personally I'm not worried: nothing moves slower than an Australian bureaucrat,
even gnumed ;-)
Ian
--
PGP public key E750652E at wwwkeys.pgp.net
9BF0 67B7 F84F F7EE 0C42 C063 28FC BC52 E750 652E
pgpjT1bZwBzT4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] SOAP2.py questions from Richard, (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] SOAP2.py questions from Richard, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/11/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] SOAP2.py questions from Richard, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/11/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] SOAP2.py questions from Richard, Ian Haywood, 2004/11/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] SOAP2.py questions from Richard, Carlos Moro, 2004/11/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] SOAP2.py questions from Richard, Ian Haywood, 2004/11/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] SOAP2.py questions from Richard, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/11/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] SOAP2.py questions from Richard, Carlos Moro, 2004/11/10
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] SOAP2.py questions from Richard, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/11/10
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] SOAP2.py questions from Richard, Carlos Moro, 2004/11/10
- [Gnumed-devel] Carlos - Soap2 - design comments, Richard Terry, 2004/11/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Carlos - Soap2 - design comments,
Ian Haywood <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Carlos - Soap2 - design comments, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/11/10
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Carlos - Soap2 - design comments, Carlos Moro, 2004/11/10
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Carlos - Soap2 - design comments, Sebastian Hilbert, 2004/11/10
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Carlos - Soap2 - design comments, Carlos Moro, 2004/11/10
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Carlos - Soap2 - design comments, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/11/10
- [Gnumed-devel] Comments on the 2.5 Design criticisms, Richard Terry, 2004/11/10
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Comments on the 2.5 Design criticisms, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Comments on the 2.5 Design criticisms, Richard Terry, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Comments on the 2.5 Design criticisms - Oops +png, Richard Terry, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Comments on the 2.5 Design criticisms, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/11/14