|
From: | Inge Wallin |
Subject: | Re: [gnugo-devel] ALL_MOVE considered superfluous |
Date: | Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:48:40 +0200 (MEST) |
> This is not a complete answer but to avoid confusion I want to point > out that there never has been an ATTACK_BOTH_MOVE. What we have had is > DEFEND_BOTH_MOVE, a converse to ATTACK_EITHER_MOVE. Right! My wrong. But the question still remains. -Inge
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |