[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET
From: |
Daniel Bump |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 08:29:26 -0700 |
Teun wrote:
> If all goes well, the 1-D board should be handled through
> the macros in liberty.h only. The idea behind this patch
> is that handling of the 1-D board can be tested by
> introducing a BOARD_OFFSET in liberty.h. BOARD_OFFSET=0
> gives the standard situation. BOARD_OFFSET>0 can be
> used for testing.
>
> Currently Gnu Go crashes in the first reading test when
> BOARD_OFFSET = 1.
It seems dangerous to define PASS_MOVE to be other than
zero. It could be hard to track down all the places where
this is assumed.
If don't try to define PASS_MOVE to be nonzero, the patch
still produces crashes however, the first in reading test 5.
Dan
- [gnugo-devel] testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET, Teun Burgers, 2002/04/28
- Re: [gnugo-devel] testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET,
Daniel Bump <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET, Arend Bayer, 2002/04/28
- Re: [gnugo-devel] testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/04/28
- [gnugo-devel] Re: testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET, Teun Burgers, 2002/04/29
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET, bump, 2002/04/29
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET, Heikki Levanto, 2002/04/29
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: testing the 1-D boardcode: BOARD_OFFSET, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/04/29