[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnucap-devel] "transient" branch
|
From: |
al davis |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnucap-devel] "transient" branch |
|
Date: |
Fri, 26 Aug 2016 01:52:36 -0400 |
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:34:08 +0200
Felix Salfelder <address@hidden> wrote:
> is this "2." intentional? the latter looks more "logical" to me...
No.
Artifact of an extra call to next(), which tells it to stop, then is
carried over. ++hidden is in the wrong place.
This example really should say 0 for all, since there are no hidden
steps. The count displayed includes the displayed step.
If there are no objections, I will change it so it is the true count of
hidden steps, not hidden+1.