[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnucap-devel] testing
From: |
Felix Salfelder |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnucap-devel] testing |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:36:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 04:39:01PM -0500, al davis wrote:
> So how about a compromise .. Use autotools to generate Make2
> and Make3.
Hi Al.
something is ready in autotools-make2-WIP.
- ./configure creates Make2 files. one for each Makefile
(nothing else touches them)
- contents of Make2 reflect configuration (currently some variables are
set, one global template is used)
- the settings are unnecessary but authoritative during build, in
particular after edits.
next questions:
- Make1 already exists. but also: autotools likes "Makefile.am"
much better. how important is the file name?
- there is no Make3, only Makefile.in. the Makefile is built from it.
how does this matter?
cheers
felix
PS: remember, "*-WIP" is just preview. it will change.
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] testing, al davis, 2015/02/09
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] testing, al davis, 2015/02/09
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] testing, Felix Salfelder, 2015/02/09
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] testing, al davis, 2015/02/09
- [Gnucap-devel] Makefiles again, Felix Salfelder, 2015/02/09
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] Makefiles again, al davis, 2015/02/09
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] Makefiles again, Felix Salfelder, 2015/02/10
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] Makefiles again, Felix Salfelder, 2015/02/10
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] testing,
Felix Salfelder <=
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] testing, al davis, 2015/02/13
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] testing, Felix Salfelder, 2015/02/13