Re: [Gnucap-devel] bugfix-WIP branch

[Joakim Nilsson]

Thank you, Felix!
Now on commit c6e4bee952affcaa4593e7e1de5e04b9c3e03620 as suggested, I
tried the same thing as initially and the result is the same. The
return status of gnucap is 0 even though there was an error. So, I
suppose this is a bug?

Here's the output:

address@hidden:~/gnucap$ gnucap -b ../brokaw.ckt
Gnucap : The Gnu Circuit Analysis Package
Never trust any version less than 1.0
Copyright 1982-2013, Albert Davis
Gnucap comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY
This is free software, and you are welcome
to redistribute it under the terms of
the GNU General Public License, version 3 or later.
See the file "COPYING" for details.
main version: 2014-07-04 bugfix-WIP debug3
core-lib version: 2014-07-04 bugfix-WIP debug3
default plugins: 2014-07-04 bugfix-WIP debug3
* Brokaw bandgap reference
QNPN1: can't find: 1
address@hidden:~/gnucap$ echo $?
0

Also, maybe these emails should have gone to bug-gnucap instead...

Regards,
Joakim

On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Felix Salfelder <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 07:48:38PM +0200, Joakim Nilsson wrote:
>> [..] But I don't find 'bugfix-WIP'.
>> Should it not be listed when I execute 'git branch -a' or do I
>> misunderstand how git works?
>
> bugfix-WIP has been fast forward merged into master and then deleted.
> this combination may lead to confusion indeed, if you're not fast
> enough.
>
> one of these should improve the situation, and should be applied to
> branches that have been mentioned on this list (next time).
>
> 1) branches remain alive after merge.
> 2) merge branches with --no-ff and fill in a message.
>
> i think 2) is better and sufficient.
>
> cheers
> felix
>
> PS: i think bugfix-WIP was c6e4bee952affcaa4593e7e1de5e04b9c3e03620 before it
> was deleted.