[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnucap-devel] a bug? (was: Re: Unstable inverter isn't unstable)
From: |
Felix Salfelder |
Subject: |
[Gnucap-devel] a bug? (was: Re: Unstable inverter isn't unstable) |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 17:57:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:25:35AM -0500, al davis wrote:
> What happened is that it found a "meta-stable" state. It's a
> singleton in the response.
a good opportuniuty to report something i consider a bug...
on the netlist orestes posted i tried
.DC Vg 0 -5 -.5 loop
.DC Vg 0 -5 -5 cont
.DC Vg 0 -5 -5
i get this
# V(3)
0. 0.016234
-0.5 1.5163
-1. 3.0163
-1.5 4.5163
-2. 6.0163
-2.5 7.5163
-3. 9.0164
-3.5 10.516
-4. 12.016
-4.5 -13.013
-5. -13.013
-5. -13.013
-4.5 -13.013
-4. -13.013
-3.5 -13.013
-3. -13.013
-2.5 -13.013
-2. -13.013
-1.5 -13.013
-1. -13.013
-0.5 -13.013
0. -13.013
# V(3)
0. 0.016234
-5. 0.057836
# V(3)
0. 0.016234
-5. 0.057836
from how i understand "cont", gnucap should have computed
[..]
-0.5 -13.013░░░░
0. -13.013░░░░
# V(3)░░░░░░
-0. -13.013░░░░
0. -13.013░░░░
# V(3)░░░░░░
0. 0.016234░░
-5. 0.057836░░
if that is true, i suspect that tr_begin should only be called from DCOP::sweep
in case !_cont. (sorry, i haven't checked for side effects a lot).
cheers
felix
- [Gnucap-devel] a bug? (was: Re: Unstable inverter isn't unstable),
Felix Salfelder <=