[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP
From: |
Kevin Zheng |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Aug 2013 08:14:00 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130628 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
On 08/05/2013 01:41, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> you can do "git push repo :branch" to delete "branch" from the remote
> "repo".
That is done; "cmake-WIP" is now one commit ahead of "master".
> what's more important: do you agree on the way i thing patchlev.h should
> work? is this feasible with CMake? i think all build systems should
> (approximately) do the same...
I already have patchlev.h working. After I rebased my work off of
master, I just need to copy the autotools-WIP version of patchlev.h and
put it in somewhere.
I was thinking; should version information be stored in a separate
object file rather than a header? When the version information changes,
it forces 'make' to rebuild most/all of the source files. This makes it
impossible to benefit from 'make' dependency tracking or ccache. Tell me
what you think.
Thanks,
Kevin Zheng
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, al davis, 2013/08/03
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, Felix Salfelder, 2013/08/04
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP,
Kevin Zheng <=
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, al davis, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, Felix Salfelder, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, al davis, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, Felix Salfelder, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, al davis, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, Felix Salfelder, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, al davis, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, Felix Salfelder, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, al davis, 2013/08/05
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] CMake WIP, Felix Salfelder, 2013/08/05