[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnucap-devel] git repo proposal
From: |
al davis |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnucap-devel] git repo proposal |
Date: |
Sun, 26 May 2013 03:38:38 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
On Sunday 26 May 2013, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> > Also, we need to include the plugin tarballs, and set up a
> > way for anyone to have a space for their work on plugins.
>
> the plugin tarballs (are you talking about gnucap-bsim,
> gnucap-spice etc?) are _packages_, also, they are licensed
> differently from gnucap. it's pretty much better to NOT
> include them into the gnucap repo. how about including them
> into the dist-tarball (optionally, of course)?
They are not included with the main tarball, and shouldn't be.
We do need a proper place for them, with revision control. In
time, there will be more of them.
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] git repo proposal, Felix Salfelder, 2013/05/02
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] git repo proposal, al davis, 2013/05/26
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] git repo proposal, Felix Salfelder, 2013/05/26
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] git repo proposal,
al davis <=
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] git repo proposal, al davis, 2013/05/26
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] git repo proposal, al davis, 2013/05/26
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] git repo proposal, Felix Salfelder, 2013/05/26
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] git repo proposal, Kevin Zheng, 2013/05/26
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] git repo proposal, Felix Salfelder, 2013/05/26
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] git repo proposal, al davis, 2013/05/26
Re: [Gnucap-devel] git repo proposal, Felix Salfelder, 2013/05/26