Re: Re[2]: [Gnucap-devel] Fwd: common_component and eval_bm_acton_base

[al davis]

On Monday 08 November 2010, address@hidden wrote:
> ad> This is incorrect because EVAL_BM_MODEL contains no
> information,  ad> only placeholders.  The correct values are
> in the daughter ad> object, which would be wiped out when
> the placeholder is copied ad> over it.
> 
> May be we speak about different things.
> I speak about _temp_c value (as an example).
> 
> It is initialized for EVAL_BM_MODEL during precalc_first()
> and then it is lost when EVAL_BM_MODEL is converted into
> EVAL_BM_SEMI_RESISTOR during expand().
> 
> please test that.

I don't see it.

_temp_c in EVAL_BM_MODEL is not used, because EVAL_BM_MODEL is 
only a placeholder.

The test cases I have show that the parameters are evaluated 
correctly.

Can you post a test case that illustrates the problem?

bmm_res.3p.ckt
Description: Text document

bmm_res.2p.ckt
Description: Text document