[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: x15
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: x15 |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:43:34 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> "There is no free software for this, and it would require reverse
> engineering"
> In USA, yes.
> In France, no, it does not require reverse engeniring but the respect of
> the law L. 331-5
We are miscommunicating. You are citing the point that reverse
engineering is lawful in the EU, in general. That is true. It may be
lawful to reverse engineer the modem chip firmware.
I say "may" because there are special laws about portable phones.
However, reverse engineering is NOT ENOUGH for the modem chip
software. Modern modem chips require the software to carry the
manufacturer's signature. Even if we had free software for the modem
chip, we could not get it to run.
I think I will stick with a device with no modem chip.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: x15, (continued)
- Re: x15, Aurélien DESBRIÈRES, 2014/12/15
- Re: x15, Omar Radwan, 2014/12/15
- Re: x15, Aurélien DESBRIÈRES, 2014/12/15
- Re: x15, Aurélien DESBRIÈRES, 2014/12/15
- Re: x15 (was: The next step of GNU in pure technical perspective), Richard Stallman, 2014/12/16
- Re: x15, Aurélien DESBRIÈRES, 2014/12/17
- Re: x15, Aurélien DESBRIÈRES, 2014/12/17
- Re: x15, Olaf Buddenhagen, 2014/12/19
- Re: x15 (was: The next step of GNU in pure technical perspective), Kete, 2014/12/15
- Re: x15, Aurélien DESBRIÈRES, 2014/12/15
- Re: x15,
Richard Stallman <=
- Interoperability (was: x15), Olaf Buddenhagen, 2014/12/19
- Re: x15, Olaf Buddenhagen, 2014/12/19
- Re: microkernels (was x15), Kete, 2014/12/19