Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk

[bill-auger]

On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 04:26:54 +0200 Denis wrote:
> And as you pointed in another mail, that's already covered as in an
> "actively maintained" criteria.

a bit too vaguely though, to capture this "action-ability"
concern - uruk would pass most of the criteria transitively
via pureos, including "actively maintained"; but it is
maintained by another distro, so not "actionable" by the uruk
maintainers

the FSDG only requires that distros are willing to address
freedom bugs - it does not explicitly say that they must be
_able_ to - presumably, that "action-ability" was taken for
granted (not specified, because it was assumed to always be the
case); but in the case of a supplemental spin-off, it is not the
case - such distros can only manage the supplemental packages