Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF

[Ineiev]

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 06:00:32PM -0400, bill-auger wrote:
> 
> i dont remember exactly, but it appears to be in response to
> someones concern that the freenix documentation is incomplete,
> which is not a problem on its own; but that, more importantly, it
> directs users to the slackware documentation to provide its
> missing information

Quite right,
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2018-07/msg00016.html
says,

> It makes zero sense to duplicate the documentation, since our
> project is dead set on keeping the technical details identical
> to Slackware as much as possible, allowing us not to fork
> support.

I believe this results in a doubt that should be resolved:
if Freenix doesn't "fork support", does it mean that it
effectively directs its users to Slackware?

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature