[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?
From: |
James Blackwell |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ? |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Apr 2004 18:05:04 -0500 |
In lists.arch.users, you wrote:
>
> >>> I couldn't find any documentation about tag --seal and --fix. What
> >>> are they supposed to achieve ?
>
> >> You might wind up getting 10 answers.
>
> > Here's another one:
>
> > Nothing. Ignore them. Understanding these options will not aid
> > you in any way.
>
> I think that that's a bit exaggerated -- it depends a bit on what
> you're trying to do. But for many and maybe even most users, that is
> a good rule of thumb.
There's one overt thing that can be noticed. rbrowse interprets sealed
versions as 'uninteresting in the usual case' and doesn't display
sealed versions by default.
--
James Blackwell Please do not send me carbon copies of mailing
Smile more! list posts. Such mail is unsolicited. Thank you!
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Andrew Suffield, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Tom Lord, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?,
James Blackwell <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Miles Bader, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Dustin Sallings, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Miles Bader, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Tom Lord, 2004/04/03
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Dustin Sallings, 2004/04/01