[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Shouldn't archive-mirror use max-age=0 ?
|
From: |
Jan Hudec |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Shouldn't archive-mirror use max-age=0 ? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 2 Apr 2004 22:28:15 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 22:00:41 +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> I've just noticed that tla archive-mirror uses HEAD with no
> Cache-Control header. Shouldn't it be using max-age=0 in case there's
> a caching proxy in-between ?
Depends on for what files. The only that need it are .listing files.
Other files in archive are write-once.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec
<address@hidden>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature