Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla

[Tom Lord]

    > From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>

    > On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 05:11:31PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
    >> I have split libarch into libarch-utils and libarch-cmds.
    >> Some files still remain in libarch.

    > The name `libarch-utils' sounds like it's meant for
    > miscellaneous add-on stuff.  I'd think that the `main' library
    > should still be called just `libarch'; putting the command
    > front-ends into `libarch-cmds' seems reasonable though.

No.  This isn't an aesthetic decision.  Brian is making the first
(previously specified) cut along one of the lines of layering in (the
current) libarch.

c.f.: http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2003-10/msg01125.html


-t