Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch)

[Andrew Suffield]

On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 07:36:01AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > 2. Performance.  On large projects, performance is absolutely abysmal,
> > both for checkins and other commands.  I often have runtimes in the
> > *minutes* for work on the Linux kernel, and that is on a fast box with a
> > local archive.  Some of that could be simple -- for instance, if I do a
> > "tla replay" followed by a "tla what-changed", it will go right back and
> > do the same thing replay did, which takes forever.  I don't know why it
> > is so much slower than Subversion, but it is.
> 
> Well, it will spend awesome amounts of time doing inventory fluff during
> commit - try this:
> strace -o ,,syscalls tla changes
> cat ,,syscalls | cut '-d(' -f1 | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | head -9

Is that just a poor reimplementation of strace -c in shell?

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature