[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validat
|
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation) |
|
Date: |
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:08:33 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 11:31:44AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> Bigger, sure, but "much bigger"? Really?
> > About two or three orders of magnitude bigger.
>
> Huh? You mean that the Emacs archive is about 100 to 1000 times larger
> than a checked out Emacs tree (which weighs at about 50MB) ?
No, a revision library.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Robert Collins, 2004/02/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Charles Duffy, 2004/02/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation),
Andrew Suffield <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/16