[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] What part of Debian is nonfree?
From: |
Michael Dorrington |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-users] What part of Debian is nonfree? |
Date: |
Sat, 14 May 2011 19:57:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110506 Icedove/3.0.11 |
On 14/05/11 18:06, Michał Masłowski wrote:
>> Surprisingly, you might want to include some of the packages from
>> Debian's non-free repository as they were moved to 'non-free' because
>> they are under the GFDL licence which is considered DFSG-incompatible.
>> http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#Licenses_that_are_DFSG-incompatible
>> I don't know what gNewSense's position is on the GFDL.
>
> We do include/plan to include them,
> http://www.gnewsense.org/Projects/DocRejectedByDebian.
This will make gNewSense "non-free" from Debian's perspective. Certainly
something to muse on.
Mike.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [gNewSense-users] What part of Debian is nonfree?, (continued)
- Re: [gNewSense-users] What part of Debian is nonfree?, Michael Dorrington, 2011/05/14
- Re: [gNewSense-users] What part of Debian is nonfree?, Karl Goetz, 2011/05/15
- Re: [gNewSense-users] What part of Debian is nonfree?, Michael Dorrington, 2011/05/22
- Re: [gNewSense-users] What part of Debian is nonfree?, Paul O'Malley, 2011/05/22
- Re: [gNewSense-users] What part of Debian is nonfree?, Michael Dorrington, 2011/05/22
Re: [gNewSense-users] What part of Debian is nonfree?, Karl Goetz, 2011/05/08