[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] libre people
From: |
Ali Davoodifar |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-users] libre people |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:22:48 +0430 |
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Sam Geeraerts <address@hidden> wrote:
> Can you explain why you think it's not proper? It seems to be the common
> term with other distributions:
To me, It brings to mind a sense of commercial business interest as
the primary goal. It commodotizes gNewSense, losing sight of its
socio-political underpinnings in the process.
That's how I view it.
--
Ali Davoodifar
- [gNewSense-users] libre people, Graziano Sorbaioli, 2009/04/24
- Re: [gNewSense-users] libre people, Koh Choon Lin, 2009/04/24
- Re: [gNewSense-users] libre people, Ali Davoodifar, 2009/04/24
- Re: [gNewSense-users] libre people, Sam Geeraerts, 2009/04/25
- Re: [gNewSense-users] libre people,
Ali Davoodifar <=
- Re: [gNewSense-users] libre people, Sam Geeraerts, 2009/04/25
- Re: [gNewSense-users] libre people, Karl Goetz, 2009/04/26
- Re: [gNewSense-users] libre people, Sam Geeraerts, 2009/04/26
- Re: [gNewSense-users] libre people, Ali Davoodifar, 2009/04/26
- Re: [gNewSense-users] libre people, Sam Geeraerts, 2009/04/27
- Re: [gNewSense-users] libre people, Sam Geeraerts, 2009/04/27
- Re: [gNewSense-users] libre people, Paul O'Malley - gnu's not unix -, 2009/04/28
- Re: [gNewSense-users] libre people, Sam Geeraerts, 2009/04/28
- Re: [gNewSense-users] libre people, Paul O'Malley - gnu's not unix -, 2009/04/28
- Re: [gNewSense-users] libre people, Sam Geeraerts, 2009/04/29