[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[gNewSense-users] Re: gen-kernel
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
[gNewSense-users] Re: gen-kernel |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:05:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
[ Moving this discussion to address@hidden as suggested by Daniel
Clark on IRC. Those who were in CC are in BCC now, please request explicitly
if you want to continue being CCed. ]
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 06:47:30PM +1030, Karl Goetz wrote:
> > - Would you like me to send all of it in a big patch, or send them
> > in separately one by one?
>
> is it just changes to gen-kernel, or builder in general? I know i do
> 'one patch fits all' for my builder changes.
Here's my working version of gen-kernel. It still needs some polishing,
but is almost finished.
> I'll be interested to see your patch, and how much of our changes to
> Builder will conflict - I have quite a large patch as well.
It would probably be more practical if I split the patch and send an
explanation for each part, also because of the conflicts.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
gen-kernel.diff
Description: Text Data
- [gNewSense-users] Re: gen-kernel,
Robert Millan <=