Re: [gNewSense-users] question about non-free package

[Karl Goetz]

On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 22:26 -0500, Kevin Dean wrote:
> vrms isn't a perfect too, especially when we're looking as deeply at
> everything as is done in gNewSense.
> 
> The Gentium fonts have come up before on this list and they were
> confirmed to be Free.

I still maintain vrms should be removed from gnewsense.
kk

> 
> -Kevin
> 
> On Dec 15, 2007 1:17 PM, marco.chieppa-crap <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi, i have already installed gNS on my 2nd pc (a laptop).
> > after that, i' had installing the 'vrms' package. It find a
> > non-fre package, a font:
> >
> > vrms: ERROR- Badly formed dpkg-status entry #1083!
> >              pkg=[emacs], pkgstatus=[install ok installed],
> > section=[]
> >             Non-free packages installed on marco-laptop
> >
> > ttf-gentium               Gentium TrueType font
> >
> >   1 non-free packages, 0.1% of 1112 installed packages.
> >
> > address@hidden:~$
> >
> > the question: is vrms wrong or is that font  really non-free?
> >
> > thanks
> > marco
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gNewSense-users mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gNewSense-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
-- 
Karl Goetz,
Debian user / Ubuntu contributor / gNewSense contributor
http://www.kgoetz.id.au