|
From: | Paul O'Malley |
Subject: | Re: [gNewSense-users] GFDL |
Date: | Sat, 01 Sep 2007 20:33:32 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) |
Tryggvi Björgvinsson wrote:
But, if I understand you correctly, the "no invariant" makes the license free. How come the packages are named for example automake1.9-nonfree.
I imagine this is a debianism to check this out why not download the packages you want apt-cache policy packagename this tells you where it is from and what its name is then make a directory lets say: /home/user/Desktop/test-packagename then in a terminal on desktop dpkg -x test-packagename/. cd test-packagename wander about it all and check licences and see what hops outI imagine it is naming based on GFDL and there is nothing we can do about that without serious hackage on lots of packages.
Trying to figure it out by myself the "no invariant" makes it possible to change the contents (freedom 3).
correct P.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |