gnewsense-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gNewSense-users] GFDL


From: Tryggvi Björgvinsson
Subject: Re: [gNewSense-users] GFDL
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 18:09:33 +0000
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Paul O'Malley wrote:
> Tryggvi Björgvinsson wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I have finished verifying packages in a. I have a question regarding the
>> GNU Free Documentation License. Debian does not consider the GFDL free
>> in the following copyright notice:
>>
> 
> IANAL however I have a strong opinion on this
> 
> with no Invariant Sections
> 
> this method got debian approval iirc
> 
> that is key to your choice - if the word no was not there we would have
> a problem
> 
> so if it said invariant sections we would have a problem
> 
> this is a bit like the BSD licences that said you have the right to make
> invariant versions but we give it to you with no invariant sections
> 
> 
> P.

IA(most definately)NAL so I'm a bit lost in the legalese.

But, if I understand you correctly, the "no invariant" makes the license
free. How come the packages are named for example automake1.9-nonfree.

Trying to figure it out by myself the "no invariant" makes it possible
to change the contents (freedom 3).

/Tryggvi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG2arcTfUwC3N5Fj0RArtRAKCPT1bm9/oe1JnTo4kKKNqktBKN4ACdHQx2
hqwJhg/vtRK9/yXo2n+UzVQ=
=GsVG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]